Distinction: good (absolutely) vs good for something vs good
E.g. It’s good to be kind, it’s good for me to study math, that’s a good car
British 20th centurary moral philosophers like GE Moore don’t like “good for X” wanting a morality that is not egoistic, instead trying to frame in terms of absolute good.
These theories overlooked possible justifications which use “good for” but are not egoistic.
Absolute good is a much more abstract / questionable concept, so it would be nice to frame ethics without it if possible.