There is tendancy of (moral/political/mind) philosphers to bring in evolution as a skyhook for their theories
It’s not usually a core argument, but it’s used as support
They usually not good support because EP is almost never empirical
Furthermore, lots of evidence of evolutionary selected features that are selected for ‘arbitrary’ reasons, unrelated to flourishing
E.g. female preferring mate to have a particular spot pattern/chirp just due to ‘how they’re wired’ / randomness
So evolutionary fitness of a moral trait is not a good supporting argument by itself