Leitner: I don’t think “analytic philosophy” exists, beyond some general stylistic concerns like attempting to be clear.
There is a current strand of moral philosophy intersecting with psychology that he would fit in with.
Nietzsche was a speculative naturalist, it’s possible that his beliefs that had empircal content are not psychological facts, but Leitner thinks after a century of psychological research that Nietzsche was right often.
E.g. he centred the role of the subconscious
Among the three dominant paradigms of moral psychology, Aristotle/Kant/Nietzsche, Nietzsche has the most plausible underlying assumptions given what we now know about psychology.